This section looks at the elements of workplace harassment as defined in The Saskatchewan Employment Act.
The elements of workplace harassment under The Saskatchewan Employment Act are:
The Saskatchewan Employment Act definition of workplace harassment includes comments, conduct, displays, actions or gestures. Workplace harassment can take many forms but can be categorized as verbal, physical or visual. The words used in The Saskatchewan Employment Act cover all these types of harassment:
The behaviour can be a single incident in the case of sexual harassment or harassment based on a prohibited ground, physical size or weight. For harassment that causes a physical or psychological injury the behaviour must be repeated or ongoing or a single incident that is serious enough that it has a lasting, harmful effect on the worker.
To be covered the behaviour must take place in the workplace. This does not mean that it has to take place on the work premises. Workplace harassment can take place outside of the walls of a traditional workplace including...
Workplace harassment can also be perpetrated by people other than co-workers, supervisors or employers. Customers, clients and the general public can also be responsible for incidents of workplace harassment.
The protections against workplace harassment in The Saskatchewan Employment Act apply to workers. For these purposes workers include students, volunteers and independent contractors in the workplace. People who have left the workplace cannot use The Saskatchewan Employment Act to deal with the workplace harassment.
They can still make a discrimination complaint under The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code if it has not been more than 12 months since the incident happened. This 12-month period can be extended in some circumstances. The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code also applies to other situations such as housing and public services.
For sexual harassment the behaviour has to be of a sexual nature. Determining if behaviour is of a sexual nature will depend on what happened, when and how.
The following are some examples:
This does not mean that the person must have told the other person to stop.
Sexual harassment has to be something the person knew or should have reasonably known was unwelcome. It is common for people to not speak up because they have fears about the impact this will have on their work environment or their safety. This is especially true when there is a power imbalance, such as when the harasser is in a position of authority. In those cases, the person must have very clearly and completely voluntarily agreed to the behaviour.
However, if a person has been told that their behaviour is unwelcome this is sufficient to show that it is in fact unwelcome.
The definition of sexual harassment goes beyond situations where the person has explicitly been told their behaviour is unwelcome.
Sometimes it is the nature of the behaviour itself that means the person should have known it was unwelcome. Other times it may be the circumstances or other previous interactions that could show the person should have reasonably known the behaviour was unwelcome.
Individuals convey displeasure at offensive sexual conduct in a variety of ways, … a reasonable person should read these signs for what they mean. Subtle indications, through gestures, facial expressions, body language, and other hints should be enough to convey rejection.
— New Brunswick Human Rights Commission
The other two types of harassment in The Saskatchewan Employment Act have to be a threat to the worker's health and safety. For harassment based on causing a physical or psychological injury the person must have known or should have reasonably known it would cause the other person to feel humiliated or intimidated.
PLEA offers free online training on preventing and addressing workplace harassment.