The law creates rules to govern the conduct of non-profit corporations and those acting for these corporations. There are a number of possible consequences when the law is not followed. There are also circumstances when the court can order that a non-profit be investigated.
The Non-profit Corporations Act, 2022 sets out a number of illegal acts. These are called offences. The Act also sets out consequences for committing these offences.
It is an offence to contravene any provision of the Act or its regulations without reasonable cause. A corporation or person can be charged with this offence any time the Act or its regulations requires something, and they do not do it. For example, a corporation that fails to submit their annual return to the Corporate Registry could be charged.
A person convicted of this offence can be fined up to $10,000, sentenced to up to 6 months in jail or both. A corporation can also be convicted of an offence. It can be fined but not jailed. However, any director or officer involved in the offence can also be convicted, and they can be jailed. The corporation and any people involved can also be ordered to comply with the Act and its regulations.
The Act requires reports and other documents to be made in a variety of situations. It is an offence for a person to make or assist in making a report that:
The person is not guilty of this offence if they did not know the statement was untrue or that there was an omission and they could not have known this using reasonable diligence.
Any member of a non-profit can apply to a court for an investigation of the corporation. The court will order an investigation where it finds grounds to do so. Grounds for an investigation may exist if it appears to the court that:
A complainant can ask the court for an order relating to oppressive or other wrongful conduct of a non-profit. The complainant must be:
The court can make an order if it finds the corporation’s actions or omissions to be oppressive to, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly disregard the interests of:
To succeed in such an application, the complainant must show that:
Oppression is the most serious conduct and means conduct that is harsh and wrongful. It is described as a clear departure from the standards of fair dealing and an abuse of power. Unfair prejudice may be something like squeezing out a member. Unfair disregard is viewed as ignoring the interests of the complainant or treating them as unimportant.
If an application is successful, a court can order a variety of different things, including that:
Disputes in non-profits are common. Sometimes, the dispute does not involve a contravention of the Act or involve grounds for the court to order an investigation. Even if it is possible to report an offence or ask for an investigation, there can be more effective ways to deal with issues. Discussion, negotiation and involving a third party through mediation are all options for resolving a dispute. If enough members are unsatisfied with how things are being run, they can elect a different board or bring something to the membership as a whole for a vote.
PLEA offers free online training on preventing and addressing workplace harassment.